Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Tunes from the Brain





















Tokyo musician Masaki Batoh, designed an instrument to pick up brain waves from the parietal and frontal lobes and turn them into radio waves, which is in turn converted into a wave pulse that is output as sound. The result? Music! Or at least a semblance of it. Read the article to find out more:

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/02/masaki-batoh-brain-waves-music/

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Sweet dream or beautiful nightmare?



First off, thanks to Beyonce for inspiring the title of this article. And to Pandora really for introducing me to the song.

On to more serious matters. Dreams have always been a mystifying topic; no one really knows what the purpose of dreams are, or how they come to manifest parts of our reality and subconscious. There has been research into when dreams occur, and several independent studies have suggested that specific types of electrical activity that occur during particular stages of sleep correlate with the occurrence of dreams. This article from one of my favorite neuroscience blogs describes a study that identified patterns of brain activity that may predict the likelihood that dreams will be recalled upon waking. Check it out:

http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2011/05/sleepy_brain_waves_predict_dream_recall.php#more

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

What's the buzz: Connectome



Earlier this week, I went to a talk by Sebastian Seung, a professor of Computational Neuroscience at MIT, at the Commonwealth Club of California. I mention the venue because it ended up influencing the demographic of the audience- many non-scientists and a noticeable majority of elderly individuals. Dr.Seung talked about his new book, Connectome, and the underlying science behind the Connectome. In his book, he defines the Connectome as a map of connections between a brain's neurons and asserts the idea that "your personal identity is encoded in the pattern of connections between your neurons. If this hypothesis is true, then any kind of personal change is ultimately about changing your connectome." Dr.Seung explained the four R's that form the basis of the dynamic nature of the Connectome: 

Reweighting means changes in the strengths of synapses.

Reconnection is the creation and elimination of synapses.
Rewiring is the creation and elimination of neural branches.
Regeneration is the creation and elimination of neurons.


Despite my initial reservations about attending this talk, I'm glad I went for several reasons. Firstly, while 'Connectome' has been a buzzword for a few years, it was enlightening to see the developments being made in the field. I, personally, am not sure if I buy the argument that "we are our connectome". I strongly believe that the way our neurons are wired up manifests itself greatly in how we behave, but I don't think it's the sole basis for "who we are". Other factors that I think should be considered are the nature of these connection, the morphology of the neurons, and the molecular cascades that might be unique to one set of neurons and not the other. Thus, if anything, Dr.Seung made me question his science, which we, as graduate students, are trained to do. Secondly, it was interesting to see a scientist communicating to a lay audience, and the analogies he tried to draw between neuronal processes and real-life situations (a particularly interesting one was equating the release of neurotransmitter at synapses to "neurons spitting on each other.") There were times when I felt frustrated by the oversimplified, dramaticized, descriptions of the scientific concepts, and had to remind myself of the nature of the audience; I was perhaps one of a handful of scientists in the audience. By the same token, it also made me think about how I would communicate my science to my friends and family who do not have a science background (something I am trying to do with this blog). As Dr.Seung showed us some, frankly breathtaking, images of the Connectome that he and his lab are trying to build, it was interesting to observe the audience's reactions and it made me think how much the term 'Connectome' and the science behind meant to the people around me. I also found out about a really cool initiative that undergraduates at MIT have undertaken- Eyewire. It encourages laymen to help contribute to research about the connections in the retina. The website has a brief background about neurons and the retina, and then participants can start exploring these connections through a game interface. Its a really interesting concept, and a little hard to describe, but definitely check it out at eyewire.org

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Profile: Eric Kandel



Eric Kandel is an American neuropsychiatrist, professor of biochemistry and biophysics at Columbia University, and a recipient of the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine and colloquially known as one of the 'Founding Fathers of Neuroscience'. My encounters with Dr.Kandel had always been through my classes and textbooks and quirky anecdotes from my undergraduate research mentor, who was a postdoctoral fellow in the Kandel Lab (for fans of Neurotree, I guess that makes Dr.Kandel my scientific grandfather!). Three years after I first came across his name, I met Eric Kandel at my graduate school interview at Columbia University. With his characteristic bow-tie, flyaway hair and Brooklyn accent, Dr.Kandel makes an unforgettable first impression. He was present at a reception during the interview weekend, and prospective students (myself included) were clamoring over each other to get the chance to talk to him. With admirable ease, Dr.Kandel made his way around the room introducing himself to students, talking about everything from the weather and science to the movie that was made depicting his journey to Neuroscience (In Search of Memory). When he finally came around to the small table I was standing at with a few of my fellow interviewees, I remember my throat sticking as I introduced myself and almost dropping my drink when he laughed at a passing comment (those who have met or heard Dr.Kandel talk will know that he has a very distinct laugh that gives the impression that he is choking on a rather large object. My roommate actually does a remarkably accurate impression). We talked briefly about my undergraduate mentor, and then with a benign pat on my shoulder, he excused himself to move on to the next group of interviewees. Predictably, I hurriedly pulled out my phone and texted my friend and made the appropriate update to my Facebook status. 

My second encounter with Dr.Kandel was a few weeks ago when he visited UCSF; my fellow graduate students and I were lucky to have a very candid discussion (once we got past the awkward pregnant pauses) with him. The talk was titled "Animal Models of Neurological Disorders", but he ended up talking about his life, how he got into science, and his views on the world of biomedical research today. I thought I'd share some of what he recounted to us rather than focus on his research; his life story is not only fascinating, but also gave us some interesting insights into the journey of becoming a scientist: how historical, cultural and personal circumstances can affect one's entry into science, the challenges one faces as a graduate student, and the importance of risk-taking, creativity and collaboration in scientific research.  

Eric Kandel was born in Vienna, Austria to middle-class Jewish parents, in November 1929, eleven years after the Austro-Hungarian Empire collapsed following its defeat in World War I. Dr.Kandel described to us, that even at a young age, he recognized the cultural richness of Vienna, which was home to some of the greatest intellectuals such as psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, writer and doctor Arthur Schnitzler, painter Gustav Klimt among many others. Many of these intellects were Austrian Jews, and they flourished despite the early traces of anti-semitism. This however changed after the Anschluss in 1938, and Dr.Kandel noted that this "final flowering of the Austrian Jewish intellectual activity" greatly shaped his early childhood. He even gave us a glimpse into the early violence against Jews. He explained to us that the one year he experienced under Nazi rule influenced his later interests in the mind, the unpredictable nature of human behavior and motivation, and the persistence of memory. 

Dr.Kandel and his family fled Austria right before the outbreak of World War II and arrived in the United States in April 1939. His family settled in Brooklyn, where he attended elementary school and later Erasmus Hall High School. He explained to us that his high school history teacher at the time- John Campagna, a Harvard University alumnus- encouraged him to apply to Harvard for college and he was one of two students from his graduating class to be admitted. He joined Harvard in 1948 with the intent of studying European intellectual history, although he sheepishly admitted to us that his "path was changed by love". As we all chuckled, he hastily explained that this was not the woman he married, but a woman who had a powerful impact on his future nonetheless- Anna Kris. Anna had also emigrated from Vienna with her parents, Ernst and Marianne Kris who were influential psychoanalysts. Frequent interactions with Anna and her family swayed his interests from history to psychoanalysis and thus began his study of the mind. 

Pacing around the room, he continued his narration: in order to solidify his study of the mind, he enrolled in medicine school at NYU Medical School in 1952, where he interacted with three influential psychoanalysts -Lawrence Kubie, Mortimer Ostow, and Syndney Margolin, who introduced him to the biology of the mind. Keen on finding more about the biological basis of mental processes, he decided to join Harry Grundfest's lab at Columbia University. Grundfest had made significant contributions to the field of neurophysiology, and was one of the only neurobiologists in the New York area at the time. In  Grundfest's lab, Dr.Kandel told us he learned the value of electrophysiological techniques and the importance of having a good preparation to test hypotheses. This is in fact where Dr.Kandel's interest in invertebrate neurobiology began (this would later lead him to his favored model system- the Aplysia). Grundfest nominated Dr.Kandel for a position at the NIH in Bethesda, which fortunately excluded him from being drafted into the military during the years following the Korean War. 


"I couldn't have joined the NIH at a better time" Dr.Kandel explained to us. There had been many breakthroughs in the field of neurosciences. Researchers including Wade Marshall had characterized a topographical map of sensory inputs from the body surface in the somatosensory cortex of the brain. Also at this time, Brenda Milner and William Scoville had described the now famous patient H.M. These findings in the field pushed Dr.Kandel to the study of learning and memory and during his time at the NIH, Dr.Kandel began looking for the perfect model system to study the neurobiology of learning. At the same time that Dr.Kandel joined Wade Marshall's lab, a budding post doctoral fellow Alden Spencer also joined with similar interests in the neurobiology of learning. Together, they decided to use the hippocampus, a neuronal structure that we now know to be essential for learning and memory, as their model system. At this point in   his story, Dr.Kandel interjected some advice: "It is important to take risks in your scientific career, but also know when to listen to others around you, especially those are more experienced". And that's exactly what happened with Dr.Kandel and Spencer; they were what Dr.Kandel described as "brash and naive" but  their risky experiments caught the interest of more experienced scientists around them and they were able to contribute some information about the physiological properties and wiring of neurons in the hippocampus.  


While his work on the hippocampus was enlightening, Dr.Kandel continued to look for a simpler model to investigate the neurobiology of memory; he believed that in a simpler circuit of neurons he could probe the actual cellular changes that occur as a result of learning. While looking for his ideal model system, Dr.Kandel told us that he faced some harsh criticisms from some very established neuroscientists (including John Eccles) for wanting to move away from mammals. He however stood by his rationale that "any insight into the modification of behavior by experience, no matter how simple the animal or the task, would prove to be highly informative"Dr.Kandel took his search with him through his residency at Harvard and a postdoctoral fellowship in Paris at Ladislav Tauc's lab, where he was first introduced to the Aplysia, the giant marine snail. The rest, as they say, is history. Dr.Kandel's work on the Aplysia characterized the neurobiology underlying the now famous gill-withdrawal reflex and introduced concept such as 'short-term memory', 'long-term memory' and sensitization, while describing the cellular basis of these phenomena. These initial studies formed the basis of learning and memory research that would later find many pioneers spread all over the world. 


Dr.Kandel was an exceptional narrator, and hearing about his journey from the perspective of a new, impressionable graduate student was a very enlightening experience. It gave me a lot of insight into how much of one's interest in science is circumstantial and made me appreciate the fact that we are surrounded by so many great scientists at UCSF who are invested in our training. When asked what advice he had for us, Dr.Kandel simply said "Never stop asking questions. And don't be afraid to take risks". With one last guttural chuckle, he ended his talk and I think all of my fellow graduate students and I left feeling a little wiser. 

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Real Talk

I came across an interesting article from the Dana Foundation, a private organization that supports neuroscience research through grants and aims to educate the public about the successes and potential of research on the brain. The Foundation produces free publications, coordinates the International Brain Awareness Week campaign, and supports the Dana Alliances, a network of neuroscientistsand. Find out more at www.dana.org


This article talks about how neuroscientists need to find efficient ways of communicating their research to the public. This will probably be more useful for my fellow grad students and other scientists who might come across my blog, but its still useful to think about the communication gap that exists between scientists and their community. Check it out!


http://www.dana.org/news/features/detail.aspx?id=28910

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Echo!

Echolocation is the process of detecting the location of objects by sensing echoes from those objects. A variety of animals echolocate, including bats, whales, dolphins, shrews and even flying squirrels. An interesting, albeit brief, discussion of echolocation in my systems neuroscience class got me scouring the internet for articles on human echolocation. I came across these two articles from a fellow blogger, check them out below. Plus, this will be a welcome change from my more (for lack of a better word) elaborate posts.

A story about a boy who has learned to echolocate so well, he plays basketball, skateboards among other things:
http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2007/10/seeing_with_sound_the_boy_who.php

What brain areas are involved in echolocation?:
http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2010/06/neural_basis_of_spatial_navigation_in_the_congenitally_blind.php